Difference between revisions of "Category:Neuroimaging"

From Pheno Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
These two theories are not entirely incompatible and there have been some hypothesis on how the two theories could be integrated to provide a better explanation for the differences seen.
 
These two theories are not entirely incompatible and there have been some hypothesis on how the two theories could be integrated to provide a better explanation for the differences seen.
  
 +
Neuroimaging research has shown that there are differences in both [[White Matter]] and [[Gray Matter]] tracts in the brain between typically developing children and those with ASD. [[Brain Disconnectivity]] in the above tracts is commonly seen.
  
−
===Brain Disconnectivity===
+
<br><br><br>
−
[[Brain_Disconnectivity]]
+
<div style="float:left; padding:10px; background:yellow; border:2px solid black;font-size:large;"><b>[[:Category:Welcome| Home Page]]</b></div>
−
 
+
−
Individuals with ASD have differences in cortical organization (narrower and more densely packed columns of neuronal cells).  This suggests that there may be altered structural connectivity and thus the connectivity between different brain structures.  They also have increases in white matter volume in the outer zones of the brain, but not the inner zones, suggesting that those with ASD have a greater number of short to medium intrahemispheric connections, and lower number of long range interhemispheric connections. Many studies have also found that there is stronger connectivity in some areas of the brain for ASD individuals when compared to typically developing individuals, and weaker connectivity in other areas of the brain.
+
−
 
+
−
The brain is activated even in it's resting state, and many researchers hypothesize that this resting state is central to nervous system functioning.<sup>8</sup> Many studies of the cerebral cortical development in young children with autism have found that the cerebrum and several of its subdivisions grow rapidly in the first few years of life.<sup>9, 10, 11</sup> Gray and white matter also have significant growth differences in children with autism, but this may not be significant because gray and white matter tends to differ depending on the region of the brain and gender.<sup>9</sup>
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
Another study of the functional connectivity of the default network in adolescents found that individuals with ASD had significantly weaker connectivity between the PCC and the superior frontal gyri, the PCC and the temporal lobes, and the PCC and the parahippocampal gyri.  They also found that weaker connectivity between the PCC and areas listed above was associated with poorer social impairment, and that more severe restrictive and repetitive behaviors were associated with weaker connectivity between the PCC and the medial prefrontal cortex, the PCC and the temporal lobes,  and the PCC and the superior frontal gyri. Poorer verbal and non-verbal communicative ability was associated with stronger connectiviety between the PCC and the parahippocampal gyrus, and the PCC and the temporal lobes. The authors suggest that adolescents with ASD may have default networks which develop for a longer time. <sup>7</sup>
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
<div style="float:left; padding:10px; background:yellow; border:2px solid black;font-size:large;"><b>[[Autism Spectrum Disorders| Main Page]]</b></div>
+
  
 
<br><br><br>
 
<br><br><br>

Latest revision as of 09:58, 27 June 2011

Neuroimaging

Brain MRI T1 movie.gif

There are have been many differences observed between typically developing children and those with ASD in neuroimaging studies using fMRI, EEG, transcranial magnetic stimulation, EMG, and structural MRI. It has been hypothesized in the Mirror Neuron System Theory of Autism that the social/communication deficits in ASD arise because of differences in activation of the Mirror Neuron System (MNS), since the mirror neuron system plays an integral role in mediating understanding of emotional states of others. However, many different areas of the brain can participate in complex social/communicative tasks, making it difficult to single out just one neural area responsible for the widespread abnormalities in socialization and communication experienced by patients with ASD. Much of current neuroimaging research in ASD operates under one of two different camps that attribute autism to different areas of less activation in the brain.

  1. Theory of Mind-Patients with ASD show lower or no activation in midline structures as compared to a control groups in many tasks, lending credence to the 'Theory Of Mind' explanation for social/communication deficits in patients with ASD. In this theory, patients with ASD have lower activation of mirror neurons in the midline structures which are responsible for "reflecting" about others' emotions or wants1,. Thus, patients have social/communication deficits because they have are unable to process the meaning of other peoples' emotions, which suggests a problem in executive processing.
  2. Embodied Simulation Theory- Scientists who want to test this theory focus their research on shared circuits that are involved in both one's own emotions and other's emotions. Numerous studies have shown that when subjects witness a goal oriented task many different types of neurons are activated in addition to those in the midline structures. For example, when a person watches another person drink a glass of milk with an expression of disgust on his face, the premotor and parietal areas are activated for the action itself, the insula areas are activated in response to the emotion of disgust, and the secondary somatosensory area is activated for the sensations involved in the task. These are the same areas that would have been activated if we drank the milk and were ourselves disgusted. Thus, we are able to understand others' emotional states and intentions because contextual cues activate the same neural circuits that are activated when we perform the same task. However, patients with ASD show diminished activation of these areas as compared to control groups. So, in this theory, the social and communication difficulties arise in patients with ASD because these areas are less activated. Consequently, they have difficulty "understanding" another's actions.1

These two theories are not entirely incompatible and there have been some hypothesis on how the two theories could be integrated to provide a better explanation for the differences seen.

Neuroimaging research has shown that there are differences in both White Matter and Gray Matter tracts in the brain between typically developing children and those with ASD. Brain Disconnectivity in the above tracts is commonly seen.




Home Page




Analytical Techniques

Retrieved from "http://lcni-3.uoregon.edu/phenowiki/index.php?title=Category:Neuroimaging&oldid=6828"